Baosteel Engineering & Technology Group Co Ltd v. China Zenith Chemical Group Ltd (Formerly Known As Xinyang Maojian Group Ltd)

Read the full judgment text of HCCT 7/2018 on BabelCite. This 高等法院原訟法庭 judgment was delivered on 2 August 2022 before Hon Mimmie Chan J.

Arbitration — Enforcement of arbitral award — Application under Sections 84 and 92 of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap 609) — The matter relates to an arbitration proceeding involving Baosteel Engineering & Technology Group Company Limited as Applicant and Heihe Longjiang Chemical Company Limited and China Zenith Chemical Group Limited as Respondents. The Plaintiff seeks leave to enforce an arbitral award against the Defendant. Judgment was delivered by Hon Mimmie Chan J in Chambers on 2 August 2022 following the hearing on 28 July 2022. No explicit legal issues or detailed reasoning are provided in the judgment excerpt. The corrigendum issued clarifies a typographical error in the reasons for decision. The case concerns procedural matters related to arbitration enforcement under the Arbitration Ordinance, with no further substantive rulings specified in the available text.

Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCCT 7/2018[2022] HKCFI 2343
Court
高等法院原訟法庭
Date02 Aug 2022
JudgeHon Mimmie Chan J
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCT 7/2018

[2022] HKCFI 2343

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTRUCTION AND ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS

NO 7 OF 2018

______________

  IN THE MATTER of an arbitration between Baosteel Engineering & Technology Group Company Limited, Applicant and Heihe Longjiang Chemical Company Limited, 1st Respondent and China Zenith Chemical Group Limited, 2nd Respondent
  and
  IN THE MATTER of an application under Sections 84 and 92 of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap 609) of the Laws of Hong Kong for leave to enforce an arbitral award

____________

BETWEEN

  BAOSTEEL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY Plaintiff
  GROUP COMPANY LIMITED  
  and  
  CHINA ZENITH CHEMICAL GROUP LIMITED Defendant
  (formerly known as XINYANG MAOJIAN GROUP LIMITED)  

____________

Before: Hon Mimmie Chan J in Chambers (open to public)
Date of Hearing: 28 July 2022
Date of Decision: 28 July 2022
Date of Reasons for Decision: 2 August 2022

____________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

____________________

On the eighth line of paragraph 13 on page 7 of the Reasons for Decision, the word “stated” should read “dated”.

Dated the 2nd day of August 2022.

  (Joanne Ma)
Clerk to Hon Mimmie Chan J