Read the full judgment text of CACV 95/2017 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 10 September 2018.
1. The 2 nd respondent the Market Misconduct Tribunal (‘the Tribunal’), at the request of the appellant Securities and Futures Commission (‘SFC’), conducted an inquiry to determine whether the 1 st respondent Cheng Chak Ngok (‘Mr Cheng’) had engaged in market misconduct activities in the nature of insider trading in respect of dealings in the securities of China Gas Holdings Limited (‘China Gas’). The Tribunal concluded that Mr Cheng had not committed market misconduct by way of insider trading
Cited by 1 case · Cites 2 cases