R Properties Ltddi and Others v. Cheung Yu Ping and Another

Case No.HCA 2236/2014[2018] HKCFI 1112

Court

High Court CFI

Date21 May 2018

Judge—

Case Document

100%

HCA 2236/2014

[2018] HKCFI 1112

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 2236 OF 2014

________________________

BETWEEN
	HEROSTAR PROPERTIES LIMITED	1^st Plaintiff
	PAN DI (潘狄)	2^nd Plaintiff
	LIU HONG XIA (劉紅霞)	3^rd Plaintiff
	GEOMAXIMA HOLDINGS COMPANY LIMITED	4^th Plaintiff
and
	CHEUNG YU PING (張宇平)	1^st Defendant
	XING XIAO JING (刑曉晶)	2^nd Defendant

________________________

(By Original Action)

AND BETWEEN
	CHEUNG YU PING (張宇平)	Plaintiff
and
	SUN TIAN GANG (孫天罡)	1^st Defendant
	GEOMAXIMA HOLDINGS COMPANY LIMITED	2^nd Defendant
	PAN DI (潘狄)	3^th Defendant
	LIU HONG XIA (劉紅霞)	4^th Defendant
	HEROSTAR PROPERTIES LIMITED	5^th Defendant

________________________

(By Counterclaim)

Before:

Deputy High Court Judge Le Pichon in Chambers

Date of Hearing:	4 May 2018
Date of Decision:	21 May 2018
Date of Corrigendum:	26 September 2018

________________________

CORRIGENDUM

________________________

1.Please note the following amendment in the Decision dated 21 May 2018:

Page 13

(1) Paragraph 43 should read:

“On the available evidence, I consider that the party pleading can reasonably say that he did not know exactly what happened. As the plea is not so unbelievable as to warrant a strike out application had such an application been made, it would not be right to refuse the amendment.”