Taching Petroleum Co Ltd v. Meyer Aluminium Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCA 1929/2017 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 7 September 2018.

1.  In paragraph 6, the first sentence of this paragraph should be read as “Meyer has admitted the delivery of diesel oil by Taching and Shell ”.

Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 1929/2017[2018] HKCFI 2095
Court
High Court CFI
Date07 Sep 2018
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 1929/2017
and HCA 1069/2018
(Heard Together)
[2018] HKCFI 2095

HCA 1929/2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 1929 OF 2017

____________

BETWEEN    
  TACHING PETROLEUM COMPANY, LIMITED Plaintiff

and

  MEYER ALUMINIUM LIMITED Defendant
____________
AND HCA 1069/2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 1069 OF 2018

____________

BETWEEN

  SHELL HONG KONG LIMITED Plaintiff

and

  MEYER ALUMINIUM LIMITED Defendant
____________
  (Heard Together)  

Before: Hon Au-Yeung J in Chambers

Date of Hearing: 7 September 2018

Date of Decision: 7 September 2018

Date of Reasons for Decision: 12 September 2018

Date of Corrigendum: 4 October 2018

________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

________________________

1.  In paragraph 6, the first sentence of this paragraph should be read as “Meyer has admitted the delivery of diesel oil by Taching and Shell”.

  (Bernard Wong)
  Clerk to the Honourable Madam
  Justice Au-Yeung