Fok Hing International Co Ltd v. Liu Hsiao Cheng

Read the full judgment text of HCA 97/2013 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 31 October 2018.

1. I adopt the same abbreviation used in my Decision handed down on 12 July 2018.

Cited by 3 cases

Case No.HCA 97/2013[2018] HKCFI 2367
Court
High Court CFI
Date31 Oct 2018
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 97/2013

[2018] HKCFI 2367

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 97 OF 2013

________________________

BETWEEN
  FOK HING INTERNATIONAL Plaintiff
  COMPANY LIMITED  
and
  LIU HSIAO CHENG Defendant

________________________

(By Original Action)

AND BETWEEN
  LIU HSIAO CHENG Plaintiff
  and
  FOK HING INTERNATIONAL
COMPANY LIMITED
1st Defendant
  WONG SHU WAI 2nd Defendant

________________________

(By Counterclaim)

Before: Deputy High Court Judge Keith Yeung SC in Chambers
Date of Written Submission by the Plaintiff (by original action) and the 1st and 2nd Defendants (by counterclaim): 6 August 2018
Date of Written Submission by the Defendant (by original action) and the Plaintiff (by counterclaim): 13 August 2018
Date of Decision on Costs: 31 October 2018

________________________

DECISION ON COSTS

________________________

1.I adopt the same abbreviation used in my Decision handed down on 12 July 2018.

2.On 12 July 2018, I dismissed the appeal by Liu against the Decision of Registrar refusing his application for specific discovery of certain documents.  I also made a cost order nisi that Liu should bear the costs of the appeal, to be taxed if not agreed.

3.On 30 July 2018, and having considered the Summons taken out on 26 July 2018 (“the Summons”) by FHI, I made an Order varying the cost order nisi and directed that the costs of the appeal and the Summons be summarily assessed.  I at the same time gave some directions on the filing of submissions.

4.On 6 August 2018, FHI filed and served its Statement of Costs.  The costs incurred were stated to be HK$140,590.

5.On 13 August 2018, Liu filed and served his List of Objections.

6.I have considered the Statement of Costs and the List of Objections carefully.  I agree that there has been some duplication of work (“Communication” (C1) and “Perusal of documents” (D2)).  Given the engagement of counsel, I also have doubts on the reasonableness of incurring 3 hours on “Preparation for the hearing” (D4) and in addition 3 hours on “Legal Research including perusing the cases authorities cited by the respective Counsel” (D6). 

7.By reason of the above, and adopting a broad brush approach, I summarily assess the costs of the appeal and the Summons to be $110,000.

 

 

  (Keith Yeung SC)
  Deputy High Court Judge

Written Submission from ONC Lawyers, for the plaintiff
(by original action) and the 1st and 2nd defendants (by counterclaim)

Written Submission from Chow Wong & Lawyers, for the defendant
(by original action) and the plaintiff (by counterclaim)