The Council of the Law Society of Hong Kong v. Cheng Chun Chung and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 929/2018 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 25 July 2018.

1. Line 6 of paragraph 25 should be “ … they are not contactable and should be excluded … ” instead of “ … they are contactable and should be excluded … ”.

Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMP 929/2018[2018] HKCFI 2093
Court
High Court CFI
Date25 Jul 2018
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP 929/2018

[2018] HKCFI 2093

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 929 OF 2018

________________________

BETWEEN    
  THE COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF HONG KONG Plaintiff
  and  
  CHENG CHUN CHUNG
(previously practising as a partner in Messrs S Cheng & Yeung)
1st Defendant
  YEUNG KAR MING
(previously practising as a partner in Messrs S Cheng & Yeung)
2nd Defendant

________________________

Before: Hon Wilson Chan J in Chambers (Open to public)
Date of Hearing: 25 July 2018
Date of Ruling: 25 July 2018
Date of 1st Corrigendum: 30 October 2018
Date of 2nd Corrigendum: 6 November 2018

_________________________________

2ND CORRIGENDUM

_________________________________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Decision dated 25 July 2018:

1.Line 6 of paragraph 25 should be “ … they are not contactable and should be excluded … ” instead of “ … they are contactable and should be excluded … ”. 

 
 

  (KWAN Man-yu, Danny)
  Clerk to Hon. Wilson Chan, J.