Re Morol Rana
Read the full judgment text of CACV 201/2018 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 24 January 2019.
1. By our judgment dated 18 September 2018 (published as [2018] HKCA 617 ), we dismissed the applicant’s appeal from the decision of Deputy High Court Judge Josiah Lam dated 21 May 2018 (published as [2018] HKCFI 1063 ) refusing leave to the applicant to apply for judicial review.
Cited by 2 cases · Cites 2 cases
|
CACV 201/2018 [2019] HKCA 109 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO 201 OF 2018 (ON APPEAL FROM HCAL 778/2017) __________________________
__________________________ Before: Hon Lam VP, Kwan and McWalters JJA in Court Date of Written Submissions: 7 November 2018 Date of Judgment: 24 January 2019 ________________ JUDGMENT ________________ Hon Lam VP (giving the Judgment of the Court): 1.By our judgment dated 18 September 2018 (published as [2018] HKCA 617), we dismissed the applicant’s appeal from the decision of Deputy High Court Judge Josiah Lam dated 21 May 2018 (published as [2018] HKCFI 1063) refusing leave to the applicant to apply for judicial review. 2.By his notice of motion filed on 27 September 2018, the applicant seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal. 3.The applicant also filed an affirmation dated 27 September 2018 and lodged his written submissions on 7 November 2018 in support of his application. 4.In the notice of motion, affirmation and submissions, the applicant did engage with our reasons for dismissing his appeal. He did not raise any question of great general or public importance for the Court of Final Appeal to determine. Nor do we find any basis to grant leave on the “otherwise” limb. Thus, the applicant failed to meet the statutory threshold under section 22(1)(b) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance (Cap 484) for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal to be granted. 5.For these reasons, we dismiss the notice of motion filed on 27 September 2018.
The applicant acting in person |
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 201/2018