Read the full judgment text of HCPI 810/2015 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 21 February 2019.
1. The plaintiff (“ P ”) was a construction site general worker. P claimed that at all material times she was employed by the 1 st defendant (“ D1 ”) and/or 2 nd defendant (“ D2 ”), and averred that (a) her mandatory provident fund (“ MPF ”) contributions were managed and/or paid by D1, (b) D1 had control over her and was responsible for delegating/arranging for her to work for D2, and (c) her work attendance record at RMD Hung Siu Kui Yard, Yuen Long, Hong Hong (“ Site ”) was maintained/managed
Cited by 8 cases · Cites 1 case