Case Document

100%Judiciary

HCA 1061/2011 & HCA 349/2012

(Consolidated)

[2019] HKCFI 702

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. 1061 OF 2011

_____________

BETWEEN
	K&L GATES	Plaintiff
and
	NAVIN KUMAR AGGARWAL	1^st Defendant
	SAT IENG SOCIEDADE UNIPESSOAL LIMITADA	2^nd Defendant
	GOLDEN WAY GLOBAL LIMITED	3^rd Defendant
	SOUTHBANK INVESTMENTS PTY LIMITED	4^th Defendant
	SAT FAT LIMITED (also known as SAT FAT SOCIEDADE UNIPESSOAL LIMITADA)	5^th Defendant
	EVER DISCOVERY LIMITED	6^th Defendant
	BURSWOOD NOMINEES LIMITED	7^th Defendant
	GOLDEN FUTURE (MANAGEMENT SERVICES) LIMITED	8^th Defendant
	VENETIAN MACAU LIMITED	9^th Defendant
	WYNN INTERNATIONAL MARKETING, LIMITED	10^th Defendant
	V-HK SERVICES LIMITED	11^th Defendant
	GOLDEN WAY COMPANY LIMITED (also known as GOLDEN WAY SOCIEDADE UNIPESSOAL LIMITADA)	12^th Defendant
	CROWN MELBOURNE LIMITED	13^th Defendant
	WYNN RESORTS (MACAU) S.A.	14^th Defendant

_____________

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. 349 OF 2011

_____________

BETWEEN
	K&L GATES	Plaintiff
	and
	MELCO CROWN GAMING (MACAU) LIMITED	Defendant

(Consolidated by the order of
Deputy High Court Judge B Chu dated 10 July 2013)

_____________

Before:

Hon Lok J in Chambers

Dates of Hearing:	6-8 February 2018
Date of Decision:	29 March 2019
Date of Corrigendum:	8 April 2019

__________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

__________________________

On page 20, the last sentence in paragraph 58, “…and I do see the need for further discovery…” should read “…and I do not see the need for further discovery…”.

Dated the 8^th day of April 2019