Amadeaus Investment Ltd v. Dr. Lin Kao Kun
Read the full judgment text of HCA 2379/2015 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 27 March 2019.
1. On Line A of page 4 should read, “9. NOTICE AND SERVICE OF PROCEEDING”.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case
|
HCA 2379/2015 [2019] HKCFI 797 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO 2379 OF 2015 ______________
______________
_______________________ C O R R I G E N D U M _______________________ Please note the following corrigendum in the Decisiondated 27 March 2019:- 1.On Line A of page 4 should read, “9. NOTICE AND SERVICE OF PROCEEDING”. 2.Line H of page 12 should read “P has made no attempt to utilize that.”. 3.Line C of page 15 should read “The objection that Mr Smith is taking in this regard on D’s behalf is at best technical in nature.”. 4.Line P of page 17 should read “P has indeed taken steps to locate D.”. 5.Line P of page 20 should read “The address provided by D in Clause 9.3 is in Shanghai.”. 6.Line Q of page 20 should read “… it would be inconsistent with the provisions of the Arrangement and invalid…”. Dated this the 9th May 2019
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 2379/2015