Read the full judgment text of HCMP 1959/2009 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 17 May 2019.
1. The Plaintiff’s firm acted as solicitor for D1 when D1 acquired the subject property. Due to the firm’s negligence, there was defect in the title. The title defect was discovered when D1 purported to sell the property to D2 and D3. Pending rectification of the title defect, the Plaintiff advanced a loan; and the Defendants’ side executed an undated assignment and undated legal charge, both in escrow.
Cites 1 case