Re Kulwinder Kaur
Read the full judgment text of CACV 591/2018 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 29 May 2019.
1. By a judgment dated 8 April 2019 [1] (“Judgment”), this court dismissed the abovenamed applicant’s appeal from Deputy Judge Josiah Lam (“Judge”)’s decision dated 12 December 2018 [2] (“Judge’s Decision”) refusing her leave to apply for judicial review of the Torture Claims Appeals Board (“Board”)’s decision dated 1 March 2018 (“Board’s Decision”) in respect her non-refoulement claim.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 2 cases
|
CACV 591/2018 [2019] HKCA 571 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO 591OF 2018 (ON APPEAL FROM HCAL 388/2018) __________________
__________________
_______________ JUDGMENT _______________ Hon Lisa Wong J (giving the Judgment of the Court): 1.By a judgment dated 8 April 2019[1] (“Judgment”), this court dismissed the abovenamed applicant’s appeal from Deputy Judge Josiah Lam (“Judge”)’s decision dated 12 December 2018[2] (“Judge’s Decision”) refusing her leave to apply for judicial review of the Torture Claims Appeals Board (“Board”)’s decision dated 1 March 2018 (“Board’s Decision”) in respect her non-refoulement claim. 2.By a notice of motion filed on 10 April 2019, the applicant sought leave to appeal against the Judgment to the Court of Final Appeal (“CFA”). The notice of motion read follows:
3.The written submission lodged on 23 April 2019, after stating the applicant’s name, case number and country of origin, ran along the same theme, as follows:
4.The applicant has not by either her notice of motion or written submission identified any issue of great, general or public importance that should be submitted for determination by the CFA. The statutory criteria laid down in s 22(1)(a) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance (Cap 484) is thus not met. Nor do we see any basis to grant leave on the “otherwise” limb under s 22(1)(b). 5.The notice of motion must be dismissed.
The applicant, unrepresented, acting in person |
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 591/2018