Fh and Another v. Wb and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 1313/2018 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 15 July 2019.

1. Page 8, paragraph 27 and line Q: “have taken legal advice” should read as “have considered the effect of ss. 9, 10 and 12 PCO”.

Cited by 11 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMP 1313/2018[2019] HKCFI 1748[2019] 5 HKC 99
Court
High Court CFI
Date15 Jul 2019
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP 1313/2018

[2019] HKCFI 1748

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 1313 OF 2018

____________

  IN THE MATTER of a joint application by FH and MH
 

and

  IN THE MATTER of an infant named B, a boy, and an infant named G, a girl
 

and

  IN THE MATTER of an application under Section 12 of the Parent and Child Ordinance (Cap 429)

_____________

BETWEEN    
  FH 1st Applicant
  MH 2nd Applicant

and

  WB 1st Respondent
  HB 2nd Respondent
  B (an infant) by the 3rd Respondent
  Official Solicitor as guardian ad litem  
  G (an infant) by the 4th Respondent
  Official Solicitor as guardian ad litem  

____________

Before: Hon Au-Yeung J in Chambers (Not Open to the Public)
Date of Hearing: 8 March 2019
Date of Judgment: 15 July 2019
Date of Corrigendum: 16 July 2019

________________

CORRIGENDUM

________________

Please note the following amendments in the Judgment dated 15 July 2019:

1.Page 8, paragraph 27 and line Q: “have taken legal advice” should read as “have considered the effect of ss. 9, 10 and 12 PCO”.

2.Page 54, paragraph 151 and line P: “paragraph 170” should read as “paragraph 169”.

3.Page 70 and line S: “executed” should read as “excused”.

4.All references to “WH” in the Judgment should read as “MH”.

  (CHEUNG Man-kit)
  Clerk to the Honourable Madam Justice Au-Yeung

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCMP 1313/2018