Fh and Another v. Wb and Others
Read the full judgment text of HCMP 1313/2018 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 15 July 2019.
1. Page 8, paragraph 27 and line Q: “have taken legal advice” should read as “have considered the effect of ss. 9, 10 and 12 PCO”.
Cited by 11 cases · Cites 1 case
|
HCMP 1313/2018 [2019] HKCFI 1748 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 1313 OF 2018 ____________
_____________
____________
________________ CORRIGENDUM ________________ Please note the following amendments in the Judgment dated 15 July 2019: 1.Page 8, paragraph 27 and line Q: “have taken legal advice” should read as “have considered the effect of ss. 9, 10 and 12 PCO”. 2.Page 54, paragraph 151 and line P: “paragraph 170” should read as “paragraph 169”. 3.Page 70 and line S: “executed” should read as “excused”. 4.All references to “WH” in the Judgment should read as “MH”.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCMP 1313/2018