Case Document

100%Judiciary

HCMC 3/2018

[2019] HKCFI 1588

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MATRIMONIAL CAUSES NO. 3 OF 2018

________________________

BETWEEN
	LCYP	Petitioner
	and
	JEK	1^st Respondent
	CTC	2^nd Respondent

________________________

Before: Hon Anthony Chan J in Chambers (Not Open to Public)

Dates of Hearing: 15 – 17, 20 – 21 and 24 May 2019

Date of Judgment: 8 July 2019

________________

CORRIGENDA

________________

Please note the following correction in the Judgment handed down on 8 July 2019:-

(1) Page 4, paragraph 10, 3^rd line, “The family went to cruises” should read “The family went on cruises”;

(2) Page 5, paragraph 14, 4^th line, “to the Wife, her husband” should read “to the Wife, the Husband”;

(3) Page 6, paragraph 18, last line, “but there is also arguments” should read “but there are also arguments”;

(4) Page 9, paragraph 28, 1^st line, “but essential they” should read “but essentially they”;

(5) Page 9, paragraph 30, 2^nd line, “most contentious part her evidence concerned” should read “most contentious part of her evidence concerned”;

(6) Page 10, paragraph 33, 6^th line, “I believe that, in maintain his refusal,” should read “I believe that in maintaining his refusal”;

(7) Page 19, paragraph 61, 1^st line, “The evidence is that Wife’s secretarial skill” should read “The evidence is that the Wife’s secretarial skill”;

(8) Page 26, paragraph 84, 2^nd line, “US$14,930,714.30” should read “US$14,930,714.03”;

(9) Page 28, paragraph 93, 2^nd line, “as part of his resources is hinges on the evidence” should read “as part of his resources hinges on the evidence”;

(10) Page 30, paragraph 98, 1^st line, “I have no doubt that Father is a” should read “I have no doubt that the Father is a”;

(11) Page 30, paragraph 101, 2^nd line, “In particular, the court is asked to examination the” should read “ In particular the court is asked to examine the”;

(12) Page 31, paragraph 103, 6^th line, “divorce at time” should read “divorce at the time”;

(13) Page 36, paragraph 115, 3^rd line, “board-brush” should read “broad-brush”;

(14) Page 37, paragraph 121, 2^nd line, “looks” should read “look”;

(15) Page 39, paragraph 126, 1^st line, “Although there is no serous dispute” should read “Although there is no serious dispute”;

(16) Page 49, paragraph 146, 1^st line, “In any case, I do believe that” should read “In any case, I do not believe that”;

(17) Page 50, paragraph 148, 2^nd line, “board-brush” should read “broad-brush”;

(18) Page 51, paragraph 153, 4^th line, “room of adjustment.” should read “room for adjustment.”;

(19) Page 53, paragraph 162, 2^nd line, “HK$26.613” should read “HK$26.312”;

(20) Page 53, paragraph 162, 4^th line, “HK$5.819m” should read “HK$5.518m”;

(21) Page 55, paragraph 169, 2^nd line, “she might have accumulated same capital” should read “she might have accumulated some capital”;

(22) Page 55, paragraph 172, 2^nd line, “whereas the Wife’s is asking for” should read “whereas the Wife is asking for”;

(23) Page 57, paragraph 180, 3^rd line, “as trustee of the children’s trust” should read “as trustee of the children’s trusts”;

(24) Page 58, line P, “and Ms Jennifer Fan of” should be “and Ms Jennifer Fan, instructed by”.