Pacific Andes Enterprises (Bvi) Ltd (in Liquidation) and Another v. Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd
Read the full judgment text of CAMP 71/2019 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 6 September 2019.
1. At page 7, paragraph 17, line J and K: the words “…the plaintiffs’ jurisdiction challenge on the basis that the court was functus on its merits…” should be amended as “…the plaintiffs’ jurisdiction challenge (made on the basis that the court was functus ) on its merits…”.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case
|
CAMP 71/2019 [2019] HKCA 1039 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 71 OF 2019 (ON AN INTENDED APPEAL FROM HCMP 320 OF 2019) ---------------------------
---------------------------
----------------------------
________________________ CORRIGENDUM ________________________ 1.At page 7, paragraph 17, line J and K: the words “…the plaintiffs’ jurisdiction challenge on the basis that the court was functus on its merits…” should be amended as “…the plaintiffs’ jurisdiction challenge (made on the basis that the court was functus) on its merits…”. 2.At page 8, paragraph 20, line K and L: the words “…will depend on its particular terms consider in the context of…” should be amended as “…will depend on its particular terms considered in the context of… ”. Dated this the 25th day of September 2019
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CAMP 71/2019