Moorthy Selvaraj v. Gmt Industrial Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 971/2019 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 4 September 2019.

1.  “administratrix of the estate no part of them have not been distributed to Moorthy have been distributed to Moorthy as would otherwise”, should read as “administratrix of the estate, no part of them have been distributed to Moorthy as would otherwise”.

Cited by 4 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMP 971/2019[2019] HKCFI 2299[2019] 4 HKLRD 572
Court
High Court CFI
Date04 Sep 2019
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP 971/2019

[2019] HKCFI 2299

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 971 OF 2019

________________________

  IN THE MATTER of section 740 of the Companies Ordinance, Cap 622 and Order 102, rule 2 of the Rules of the High Court, Cap 4A
  and
  IN THE MATTER of GMT INDUSTRIAL LIMITED

________________________

BETWEEN    
  MOORTHY SELVARAJ Plaintiff

and

  GMT INDUSTRIAL LIMITED Defendant

________________________

Before: Hon Coleman J in Chambers (Open to the Public)

Date of Hearing: 4 September 2019

Date of Ruling: 4 September 2019

Date of Corrigendum: 15 October 2019

________________________

CORRIGENDUM

________________________

Please note the following corrigendum in paragraph 5 at page 3 between lines H and I in the Judgment dated 4 September 2019: -

1.  “administratrix of the estate no part of them have not been distributed to Moorthy have been distributed to Moorthy as would otherwise”, should read as “administratrix of the estate, no part of them have been distributed to Moorthy as would otherwise”.

Dated the 15th day of October 2019

  (Alvin Kwok)
   for Registrar, High Court

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCMP 971/2019