Junior Police Officers’ Association of the Hong Kong Police Force v. Electoral Affairs Commission and Others
Read the full judgment text of CACV 489/2019 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 22 October 2019 before Hon Poon Ag CJHC and Hon Lam VP.
1. In paragraph 30 at p.14H, “perpetuators” should read “perpetrators”.
Outcome: {"disposition": "", "orders": [], "sentencing_math": ""}
Cited by 6 cases · Cites 2 cases
|
CACV 489/2019 [2019] HKCA 1197 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO 489 OF 2019 (ON APPEAL FROM HCAL 3042/2019) ________________
________________
_______________________ 2ND CORRIGENDUM _______________________ 1.In paragraph 30 at p.14H, “perpetuators” should read “perpetrators”. 2.In paragraph 34 at p.15N-O, “… to go into great detail the election process …” should read “… to go into great detail about the election process …”. 3.In paragraph 35(2) at p.16B, “The REO …” should read “The Registration and Electoral Office (“REO”) …” 4.In paragraph 35(3) at p.16F, “(www.voterfinfo.giv.hk)” should read “(www.voterinfo.gov.hk)”. 5.In paragraph 35(5) at p.16S-T, “… the specified from …” should read “… the specified form …”. 6.In footnote 16 at p.23T, “It terms of …” should read “In terms of …”.
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 489/2019