Chee Fei Ming v. Director of Food and Environmental Hygiene and Another
Read the full judgment text of CACV 489/2018 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 16 December 2019 before Hon Lam VP, Barma and Au JJA.
Administrative law – judicial review – civil appeals – CACV 489/2018 (on appeal from HCAL 73/2013) and CACV 490/2018 (on appeal from HCAL 110/2013) – heard together – Applicant in CACV 489/2018 originally CHEE FEI MING, substituted by PUN LIN FA pursuant to consent order dated 13.10.2014 – 1st Respondent in both appeals: DIRECTOR OF FOOD AND ENVIRONMENTAL HYGIENE – 2nd Respondent in both appeals: SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE – Interested Party in CACV 489/2018: LANDS DEPARTMENT – Applicant in CACV 490/2018: HUNG SHUI FUNG – heard before Hon Lam VP, Barma and Au JJA – dates of hearing: 12 and 13 November 2019 – date of judgment: 16 December 2019 – date of corrigendum: 17 January 2020 – corrigendum to paragraph 82 of the judgment clarifying that the Court was not satisfied that all relevant evidence on applications in respect of non-Management Scheme cases had been placed before the Court.
Cited by 5 cases · Cites 2 cases
|
CACV 489/2018 [2019] HKCA 1425 (Heard together) IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO 489 OF 2018 (ON APPEAL FROM HCAL 73/2013) __________________________ BETWEEN
__________________________ AND CIVIL APPEAL NO 490 OF 2018 (ON APPEAL FROM HCAL 110/2013) __________________________ BETWEEN
__________________________ (HEARD TOGETHER)
__________________ CORRIGENDUM __________________ Please note the following corrigendum for the Judgment dated the 16th day of December 2019:- 1.Page 36, paragraph 82: “At that stage, the Court was not satisfied that all relevant evidence on applications in respect of non-Management Scheme cases.” should read: “At that stage, the Court was not satisfied that all relevant evidence on applications in respect of non-Management Scheme cases had been placed before the Court.”
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 489/2018