The Incorporated Owners of Kam Luk Building v. 吳靜燕

Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 1648/2016 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 9 April 2020.

Cites 2 cases

Case No.DCCJ 1648/2016[2020] HKDC 196
Court
District Court
Date09 Apr 2020
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

DCCJ 1648/2016

[2020] HKDC 196

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CIVIL ACTION NO 1648 OF 2016

---------------------------

BETWEEN

  THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF KAM LUK BUILDING Plaintiff
 

and

 
  吳靜燕 Defendant
---------------------------

Before: His Honour Judge Andrew Li in Court

Dates of Hearing: 8 to 9 & 30 October 2019

Date of Judgment: 9 April 2020

CORRIGENDUM

Notice is hereby given that the following amendments be made to the Judgment:

Page 10, paragraph 30, 5th line:

“… PW1 has confirmed that he had had no personal knowledge …” should read as “… PW1 has confirmed that he had no personal knowledge …”.

Page 27, paragraph 88, 3rd line:

“… and have excluded all others from using it as the small paper bags…” should read as “... and have excluded all others from using it is the small paper bags…”.

Page 34, paragraph 111, 3rd line:

“… nor Shun Shing (as the first owner of developer) …” should read as “… nor Shun Shing (as the first owner or developer) …”.

Page 35, paragraph 112, 2nd line:

“… following the sale of all other units to individual owners of the Building coming into effect of the DMC in 1973…” should read as “… following the sale of all other units to individual owners of the Building and the coming into effect of the DMC in 1973…”.

Page 43, paragraph 131, 2nd line:

“I find there was “an assent or lying in relation to the acts…” should read as “I find there was “an assent or lying by in relation to the acts…”.

Page 43 to 44, paragraph 132, 7th line:

“… to issue a demand letter dated 8 November 2010 to D to move out of Staircase 63…” should read as “… to issue a demand letter dated 8 November 2010 to request D to move out of Staircase 63…”.

Page 45, paragraph 136, 7th line:

“… to instruct a contractor to install am electricity meter…” should read as “… to instruct a contractor to install an electricity meter…”.

Page 48, paragraph 149, 1st line:

“…and order that the tile of P and/or its predecessors…” should read as “… and order that the title of P and/or its predecessors…”.

Dated the 22nd day of April 2020

( Andrew Li )
District Judge

Mr Dickey Cheung, instructed by Huen & Partners, for the plaintiff

Mr Adrian Leung, instructed by Liu, Chan & Lam, for the defendant on the instructions of the Director of Legal Aid