Char on Man and Another v. Peking Fur Factory (Hong Kong) Ltd and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 768/2018 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 27 June 2019.

1. On page 5, in paragraph 9, between lines J and K, the sentence "grant the orders sought in the originating summons " should be amended to read "grant the order sought in paragraph 1 and dismiss paragraphs 2 and 3 of the amended originating summons."

Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMP 768/2018[2019] HKCFI 2141
Court
High Court CFI
Date27 Jun 2019
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP 768/2018

[2019] HKCFI 2141

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 768 OF 2018

________________

 

IN THE MATTER of Inherent Jurisdiction of the High Court

 

and

 

IN THE MATTER the Peking Fur Factory (Hong Kong) Limited

________________

BETWEEN

  CHAR ON MAN 1st Plaintiff
  O & E INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 2nd Plaintiff

and

  PEKING FUR FACTORY (HONG KONG) LIMITED 1st Defendant
  CHAN MAN HAU PATRICK 2nd Defendant
  叶雪明 3rd Defendant
________________

Before: Hon Harris J in Chambers

Date of Hearing: 27 June 2019

Date of Decision: 27 June 2019

Date of Reasons for Decision: 3 September 2019

________________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

________________________________

1.On page 5, in paragraph 9, between lines J and K, the sentence "grant the orders sought in the originating summons " should be amended to read "grant the order sought in paragraph 1 and dismiss paragraphs 2 and 3 of the amended originating summons."

  (Janice LI)
Clerk to the Honourable Mr. Justice Harris

Dated : 26 September 2019

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCMP 768/2018