HKSAR v. Chung Yiu Lam

Read the full judgment text of CACC 252/2018 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 28 May 2020 before Hon McWalters JA.

1. “Yeung testified for the prosecution in the applicant’s first trial and she was rewarded for so doing by the Court of Appeal who reduced her sentence to 17 years and 7 months’ imprisonment. See HKSAR v Yeung Hoi Ting [2019] 3 HKLRD 516. She did not testify in this retrial.”

Outcome: {"disposition": "", "orders": [], "sentencing_math": ""}

Cited by 2 cases · Cites 2 cases

Case No.CACC 252/2018[2020] HKCA 435
Court
Court of Appeal
Date28 May 2020
JudgeHon McWalters JA
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACC 252/2018

[2020] HKCA 435

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 252 OF 2018

(ON APPEAL FROM HCCC 36 OF 2018)

------------------------

BETWEEN    
  HKSAR Respondent

and

  CHUNG YIU LAM (鍾耀林) Applicant

------------------------

Before: Hon McWalters JA in Court
Date of Hearing: 28 May 2020
Date of Judgment: 28 May 2020
Date of Reasons for Judgment: 5 June 2020

__________________________

CORRIGENDUM

__________________________

The footnote 2 on page 4,

1.  “Yeung testified for the prosecution in the applicant’s first trial and she was rewarded for so doing by the Court of Appeal who reduced her sentence to 17 years and 7 months’ imprisonment. See HKSAR v Yeung Hoi Ting [2019] 3 HKLRD 516. She did not testify in this retrial.”

should read

2.  “Yeung gave a non-prejudicial statement to the prosecution and she was rewarded for so doing by the Court of Appeal who reduced her sentence to 17 years and 7 months’ imprisonment. See HKSAR v Yeung Hoi Ting [2019] 3 HKLRD 516. She did not testify in the first trial or this retrial.”

Dated this 11th day of June, 2020.

(Isabella Kwan)
for Registrar, High Court

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACC 252/2018