BabelCite

Madison Lab Ltd v. Pu Yan and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 757/2019 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 3 July 2020.

1. Paragraph 17, line G “… the Defendants say that they are content in to pursue a variation …” should read “… the Defendants say that they are content to pursue a variation …”.

Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMP 757/2019[2020] HKCFI 1409
Court
High Court CFI
Date03 Jul 2020
Judge—
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP 757/2019

[2020] HKCFI 1409

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 757 OF 2019

________________________

BETWEEN    
  MADISON LAB LIMITED Plaintiff

and
  PU YAN 1st Defendant
  NAN NING 2nd Defendant
  DANIEL KELMAN 3rd Defendant

________________________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge Abraham Chan, SC in Chambers
Date of Written Submissions: 8, 22, 29 April 2020
Date of Decision on Costs: 3 July 2020
Date of Corrigendum: 6 July 2020

________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

________________________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Decision on Costs dated 3 July 2020: -

1.Paragraph 17, line G “… the Defendants say that they are content in to pursue a variation …” should read “… the Defendants say that they are content to pursue a variation …”.

(Hilary Yu)
Clerk to Deputy High Court Judge
Abraham Chan SC

Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

Madison Lab Ltd v. Pu Yan and Others
HCMP 757/2019
High Court CFI03 Jul 2020
Cited by 1 case

Other judgments that cite this case

Madison Lab Ltd v. Pu Yan and Others
High Court CFI03 Jul 2020
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCMP 757/2019

Madison Lab Ltd v. Pu Yan and Others
High Court CFI12 Mar 2020
Madison Lab Ltd v. Pu Yan and Others
High Court CFI03 Jul 2020