Cinatic Technology Ltd v. Heykas Technology Co. Ltd and Another
Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 5874/2019 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 18 June 2020.
1. Page 14, 3 rd line should read as “Miss Natalie So and Mr Frederick Hui (Solicitor Advocate), instructed by Zhong Lun Law Firm, for the 2 nd defendant”.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case
|
DCCJ 5874/2019 [2020] HKDC 519 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION CIVIL ACTION NO 5874 OF 2019 --------------------
-------------------- Before: His Honour Judge Andrew Li in Chambers (Open to public) Date of Hearing: 18 June 2020 Date of Decision: 18 June 2020 Date of handing down Reasons for Decision: 9 July 2020 CORRIGENDUM Notice is hereby given that the following amendment be made to the Reasons for Decision: 1. Page 14, 3rd line should read as “Miss Natalie So and Mr Frederick Hui (Solicitor Advocate), instructed by Zhong Lun Law Firm, for the 2nd defendant”. Dated the 15th day of July 2020
Miss Agnes Kwong, instructed by Messrs Huen & Partners, for the plaintiff The 1st defendant acting in person being absent and did not attend the hearing Miss Natalie So and Mr Frederick Hui (Solicitor Advocate), instructed by Zhong Lun Law Firm, for the 2nd defendant Mr Peter So of Messrs Deacons for the respondent | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under DCCJ 5874/2019