Atkins China Ltd v. China State Construction Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 1193/2020 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 14 August 2020.

1.  Page 7, paragraph 24 and line M: “one hour’s hearing time” should read as “half an hour’s hearing time”.

Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMP 1193/2020[2020] HKCFI 2092
Court
High Court CFI
Date14 Aug 2020
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP 1193/2020

[2020] HKCFI 2092

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 1193 OF 2020

____________

  IN THE MATTER of an application for a declaratory judgment pursuant to Order 15, rule 16 of the Rules of the High Court Cap 4A
 

and

  IN THE MATTER of an agreement of final account dated 20 December 2019 between ATKINS CHINA LIMITED and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (HONG KONG) LIMITED
 

and

  IN THE MATTER of an application for an injunction pursuant to Section 21L of the High Court Ordinance Cap 4

_____________

BETWEEN    
  ATKINS CHINA LIMITED Plaintiff

and

  CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (HONG KONG) LIMITED Defendant
     

____________

Before: Hon Au-Yeung J in Chambers

Date of Hearing: 14 August 2020

Date of Decision: 14 August 2020

Date of Corrigendum: 17 August 2020

________________

CORRIGENDUM

________________

Please note the following amendment in the Decision dated 14 August 2020:

1.  Page 7, paragraph 24 and line M: “one hour’s hearing time” should read as “half an hour’s hearing time”.

   (CHEUNG Man-kit)
  Clerk to the Honourable Madam
Justice Au-Yeung

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCMP 1193/2020