Good Return (Bvi) Ltd v. Wickham v. Ntures Ltd and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCA 987/2016 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 4 September 2020.
1. The last line of paragraph 40 of the Judgment should read, "I firmly
Cited by 3 cases · Cites 1 case
|
HCA 987/2016 [2020] HKCFI 2287 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO 987 OF 2016 _____________
_____________ Before: DHCJ Douglas Lam SC in Court Dates of Hearing: 8-10 June 2020 Date of Judgment: 4 September 2020 Date of Corrigendum: 8 September 2020 ___________________________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ___________________________________ Please note the following amendments in the Judgment dated 4 September 2020: - 1. The last line of paragraph 40 of the Judgment should read, "I firmly prefer the evidence of Matthew Chan."; 2. At the end of paragraph 70 should be added the following sentence: "The counterclaim is dismissed."; and 3. The first line of paragraph 34 should read, "In her witness statement (original in Chinese with an English version subsequently provided by her solicitors) ...". Dated the 8th day of September 2020
| |||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 987/2016