Re Gurjant Singh
Read the full judgment text of CACV 88/2018 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 14 December 2020.
1. This is the second time the Applicant sought leave to appeal against the dismissal of his appeal on 6 August 2018. The Applicant’s first Notice of Motion filed on 20 August 2018 had been dismissed by the Court of Appeal on 18 January 2019 pursuant to an Unless Order of 10 January 2019.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case
|
CACV 88/2018 [2020] HKCA 1015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO 88OF 2018 (ON APPEAL FROM HCAL 704/2017) ____________________
____________________
___________________ JUDGMENT ___________________ Hon Lam VP (giving the Judgment of the Court): 1.This is the second time the Applicant sought leave to appeal against the dismissal of his appeal on 6 August 2018. The Applicant’s first Notice of Motion filed on 20 August 2018 had been dismissed by the Court of Appeal on 18 January 2019 pursuant to an Unless Order of 10 January 2019. 2.It is an abuse of court process for the Applicant to file a second Notice of Motion on 13 November 2020. As such, his second Notice of Motion should be dismissed. 3.In any event, having considered the second Notice of Motion, we do not find any questions of great general and public importance to be submitted to the Court of Final Appeal for determination. The requirement for granting leave under Section 22 of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance is not met. 4.For these reasons, the Notice of Motion of 13 November 2020 is dismissed.
The applicant acting in person |
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 88/2018