Read the full judgment text of CACC 000162/1999 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 28 October 1999.
1. The Applicant faced 28 charges, charges (1) to (27) for theft and charge (28) a forgery. Each of the first 27 charges was for the Applicant stealing a cheque, or the chose in action in the cheque being the money represented by the amount shown on it, drawn on a bank account of the company in which she worked, namely, DPI (HK) Ltd. ("DPI"), or of an associated company known as KCP Limited ("KCP"). To be more specific, only charges (22), (23), (24) and (25) involved cheques drawn on KCP's accou