Secretary for Justice v. Wong Kay Din
Read the full judgment text of CAAR 7/1998 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 9 September 1999.
1. The point of law we are being requested to certify is "whether the Court of Appeal has rightly rely on the authorities of R. v. Barrick [1985] 81 CR. APP. R. 78 and R. v. Trevor Clark [1998] 2 CR. APP. R. 137 in arriving at a more severe sentence." (s.i.c.)
Cited by 23 cases
|
CAAR000007A/1998 CAAR 7/1998 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL APPLICATION FOR REVIEW NO. 7 OF 1998 (ON APPEAL FROM DCCC 11/98, 81/98 AND 1216/97 (CONSOLIDATED))
--------------------------------------- Coram: Hon. Stuart-Moore, V.-P., Mayo, and Leong, JJ.A. in Court Date of hearing: 9 September 1999 Date of delivery of decision: 9 September 1999 ---------------------- D E C I S I O N ---------------------- Mayo J.A. (giving the decision of the Court): 1. The point of law we are being requested to certify is "whether the Court of Appeal has rightly rely on the authorities of R. v. Barrick [1985] 81 CR. APP. R. 78 and R. v. Trevor Clark [1998] 2 CR. APP. R. 137 in arriving at a more severe sentence." (s.i.c.) 2. We do not consider that any issues of law of great and general importance arise from these matters and we decline to grant a certificate under the section.
Representation: Mr. Graham Goodman, S.G.C. (Secretary for Justice) for Respondent Wong Kay-din, Applicant in person |
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CAAR 7/1998