Chung Pui Tak and Another v. Tam Chi Leung Nolan and Another

HCA 1439/2012

[2021] HKCFI 242

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 1439 OF 2012

________________

________________

___________________

CORRIGENDUM

___________________

Please note the following corrigendum for the Judgment dated the 27^th January 2021: -

1.Page 1, line K, the full name of the 2^nd Defendant should read “Best Tri Printing Company Limited”.

2.Page 2, line N, “By then” should read “By the time of the trial in 2018”.

3.Page 21, line S, “… was drawn by D1 on the bank account …” should read “… was drawn by P1 on the bank account…”.

4.Page 27, line A, “ P2 must clearly know …” should read “P1 must clearly know …”.

5.Page 27, line N, “while D1 was not a beneficial owner …” should read “while P1 was not a beneficial owner …”.

6.Page 28, line D, “Contrary to D2’s case” should read “Contrary to D1’s case”.

7.Page 55, line K, “… issue unified involves to D2’s Mainland customers …” should read “… issue unified invoices to D2’s Mainland customers …”.

8.Page 56, line I to J, “… from the perspective of D2” should read “… from the perspective of P2”.

9.Page 67, line P, “… RMB 4,597,831.75…” should read “… RMB 5,497,831.75 …”.

10.Page 76, line U, “… HK$3,358,981.50 said to be …” should read “… HK$3,298,851.30 said to be …”.

11.Page 79, line E, “… the cheque no 399614 …” should read “… the cheque no 480029 …”.

12.Page 79, line G, “being part proceeds of the cheque …” should read “being proceeds of the cheque …”.

Dated the 24^th February 2021