Lei Shing Hong Credit Ltd v. Accufast Ltd and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 1749/2014 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 30 March 2021.

1. Paragraph 60 should read “... with certificate for counsel, to be summarily assessed.”.

Cited by 6 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMP 1749/2014[2021] HKCFI 853
Court
High Court CFI
Date30 Mar 2021
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP 1749/2014

[2021] HKCFI 853

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 1749 OF 2014

______________

 

IN THE MATTER of the property known as ALL THOSE 43 equal undivided 600th parts or shares of and in ALL THAT piece or parcel of ground registered in the Land Registry as RURAL BUILDING LOT NO 1028 (“The Lot”) and of and in the buildings thereon known as THE BEACHFRONT (璧池), No 7 Belleview Drive, Hong Kong (“the Estate”) TOGETHER with the right to the exclusive use occupation and enjoyment of ALL THAT HOUSE No 3 (including the Yards) of the Estate (which said House and the Yards are respectively shown and coloured Pink and Yellow on Plan No 1 annexed to an Assignment registered in the Land Registry by Memorial No UB2718629 (“the Assignment”) and the said House comprising the Garage Level, Level 1, Level 2, Level 3 and Roof is more particularly shown and coloured Pink on Plan No 2 annexed to the Assignment)

 

and

 

IN THE MATTER of a First Legal Charge dated 21st August 2013 and registered in the Land Registry by Memorial No 13082300280156

 

and

 

IN THE MATTER of Order 88 rule 1, Order 83A, and Order 28 of the Rules of the High Court, Cap 4A

_____________

BETWEEN

  LEI SHING HONG CREDIT LIMITED Plaintiff

and

  ACCUFAST LIMITED 1st Defendant
  HUI KING CHUN 2nd Defendant
  HUI NGAI HING ABBIE 3rd Defendant

______________

Before: Hon K Yeung J in Chambers

Date of Hearing: 4 November 2020

Date of Decision: 30 March 2021

Date of Corrigendum: 12 April 2021

________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

________________________


Please note the following corrigendum in the Decision dated 30 March 2021:-

1. Paragraph 60 should read “... with certificate for counsel, to be summarily assessed.”.

2. Line T of page 21, should read “Attendance of the 2nd Defendant been excused”.

  (Vivian Fu)
  Clerk to the Honourable Mr Justice K Yeung