Kot See for v. Kung Ho Yin and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCA 2208/2019 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 19 March 2021.

1.  Page 8 and paragraph 23: “…a plaintiff to go to trial on distinct claims that…” should read as “…a plaintiff to go to trial on distinct claims against the defaulting defendant that…”.

Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 2208/2019[2021] HKCFI 711
Court
High Court CFI
Date19 Mar 2021
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 2208/2019

[2021] HKCFI 711

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 2208 OF 2019

____________

BETWEEN    
  KOT SEE FOR (葛師科) Plaintiff

and

  KUNG HO YIN (龔浩然) 1st Defendant
  LAM MAN CHEUNG (林萬璋) 2nd Defendant
  FUNG SHING KA (馮聖嘉) 3rd Defendant
  WAYSHINE CORPORATION LIMITED
(匯彰有限公司)
4th Defendant
  WAYSHINE GLOBAL GROUP LIMITED
(匯彰環球集團有限公司)
5th Defendant
  SHI HONGRU (施鴻儒) 6th Defendant
  CHAO HANG MEI (周杏薇) 7th Defendant
  SHAO FAPING (邵法平) 8th Defendant
  CHAN LEONG HANG (陳亮行) 9th Defendant
  CHEN JINNAN (陳进南) 10th Defendant
  KWOK KA LOK (郭家樂) 11th Defendant
  JUMBO BOND (ASIA) LIMITED
(真寶(亞洲)有限公司)
12th Defendant
  GREAT TIME WATCH ENTERPRISE LIMITED
 (寶豐鐘錶實業有限公司)
13th Defendant
  E & C INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
(灝豐國際有限公司)
14th Defendant
  WANG JING (王婧) 15th Defendant
  FORTUNE EFFORT INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
(時運利國際有限公司)
 
  AU YEUNG HO SUM (歐陽可森) 17th Defendant

____________

Before: Hon Au-Yeung J in Chambers

Date of Hearing: 17 March 2021

Date of Judgment: 19 March 2021

Date of Corrigendum: 16 April 2021

__________________

CORRIGENDUM

__________________

Please note the following amendment in the Judgment dated 19 March 2021:

1.  Page 8 and paragraph 23: “…a plaintiff to go to trial on distinct claims that…” should read as “…a plaintiff to go to trial on distinct claims against the defaulting defendant that…”.

  (CHEUNG Man-kit)
  Clerk to the Honourable Madam Justice Au-Yeung