HKSAR v. Ma Ka Kin

Read the full judgment text of CACC 297/2019 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 23 April 2021.

1.  In paragraph 4, reference to the address should be replaced with “(address omitted) (referred to as Flat X)”.

Cites 2 cases

Case No.CACC 297/2019[2021] HKCA 524
Court
Court of Appeal
Date23 Apr 2021
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACC 297/2019

[2021] HKCA 524

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 297 OF 2019

(ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO 312 OF 2017)

________________________

BETWEEN

  HKSAR Respondent
  and  
  MA KA KIN (馬家健) Appellant

________________________

Before:  Hon Zervos JA in Court

Date of Hearing:  22 and 23 April 2021

Date of Judgment:  23 April 2021

Date of Corrigendum:  26 April 2021

________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

________________________


Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 23 April 2021:

1.  In paragraph 4, reference to the address should be replaced with “(address omitted) (referred to as Flat X)”.

2.  In paragraph 5, reference to the address should be replaced with “Flat X”.

3.  In the penultimate sentence in paragraph 36, replace “a” before “consequence” with “an apparent”.

  (Lewis Chan)
  for Registrar, High Court