Read the full judgment text of HCA 2593/2017 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 4 June 2021.
1. The Plaintiffs claim that they were induced, by fraudulent misrepresentation, to enter into an agreement with various business partners to use the 2nd Defendant (“ SSHK ”) as a corporate vehicle for the holding of the curtain wall business conducted by the Plaintiffs and the 1st Defendant, and to inject funds into the business. They also complain of breaches of the agreement. They seek to rescind the agreement and to obtain restitution of the funds invested into the business, and an award of
Cited by 9 cases · Cites 6 cases