“K” v. Commissioner of Police

Read the full judgment text of CACV 33/2020 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 21 April 2021.

1.  Page 25 paragraph 78:“Thirdly, … as illustrated the absurdity of such general right highlighted by the Judge at [42] of the judgment.” should read “Thirdly, … as illustrated by the absurdity of such general right highlighted by the Judge at [42] of the judgment.”

Cited by 3 cases · Cites 2 cases

Case No.CACV 33/2020[2021] HKCA 523
Court
Court of Appeal
Date21 Apr 2021
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 33/2020

[2021] HKCA 523

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO 33 OF 2020

(ON APPEAL FROM HCAL 2643/2019)

____________________

BETWEEN    
“K” Applicant
and
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Respondent
and
HOSPITAL CHIEF EXECUTIVE, QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL Interested Party

____________________

Before:  Hon Poon CJHC, Lam VP and Au JA in Court

Date of Hearing:  5 February 2021

Date of Judgment:  21 April 2021

Date of Corrigendum:  7 June 2021

________________________

CORRIGENDUM

________________________

Please note the following corrigendum for the Judgment dated the 21st day of April 2021:

1.  Page 25 paragraph 78:“Thirdly, … as illustrated the absurdity of such general right highlighted by the Judge at [42] of the judgment.” should read “Thirdly, … as illustrated by the absurdity of such general right highlighted by the Judge at [42] of the judgment.”

 

  (Sandy Fung)
for Registrar, High Court

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACV 33/2020