Taching Petroleum Co, Ltd v. Meyer Aluminium Ltd
Read the full judgment text of CACV 477/2020 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 5 January 2021.
1. Page 23 paragraph 67: “It is therefore not right for Mr Lee to assume that the Tribunal would exercise the discretion in the same way as did the Court of First Instance .” should read “It is therefore not right for Mr Lee to assume that the Court of First Instance would exercise the discretion in the same way as did the Tribunal .”
Cited by 4 cases · Cites 2 cases
|
CACV 477/2020, CACV 478/2020, [2021] HKCA 294 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO 477 OF 2020 AND 621 OF 2020 (ON APPEAL FROM CTA 1/2018) _________________________
_________________________ AND CIVIL APPEAL NO 478 OF 2020 AND 622 OF 2020 (ON APPEAL FROM CTA 2/2018) _________________________
_________________________ (Heard together) Before: Hon Poon CJHC and Lam VP in Court Date of Hearing: 5 January 2021 Date of Judgment: 5 January 2021 Date of Reasons for Judgment: 11 March 2021 Date of Corrigendum: 16 June 2021 ________________________ CORRIGENDUM ________________________ Please note the following corrigendum for the Reasons for Judgment dated the 11th day of March 2021: 1. Page 23 paragraph 67: “It is therefore not right for Mr Lee to assume that the Tribunal would exercise the discretion in the same way as did the Court of First Instance.” should read “It is therefore not right for Mr Lee to assume that the Court of First Instance would exercise the discretion in the same way as did the Tribunal.”
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 477/2020