BabelCite

HKSAR v. Ng Kin Keung

Read the full judgment text of DCCC 120/2020 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 15 July 2021.

60. Defence argued that there was a link between the Mainland offence and the Hong Kong offences in that there were synchronized raids on the same day ie 16 June 2016.

Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case

Case No.DCCC 120/2020[2021] HKDC 869
Court
District Court
Date15 Jul 2021
Judge—
Case Document
100%Judiciary

DCCC 120/2020

[2021] HKDC 869

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CRIMINAL CASE NO 120 OF 2020

________________________

  HKSAR  
  v  
  NG KIN KEUNG  

________________________

Before:  H.H.J Tam in District Court
Date of Sentence:  15 July 2021
Date of Corrigendum:  2 August 2021

CORRIGENDUM

Please note the following amendment in the reasons for sentence:

60. Defence argued that there was a link between the Mainland offence and the Hong Kong offences in that there were synchronized raids on the same day ie 16 June 2016.

The above date should be corrected to "16 June 2013".

Dated the 2nd day of August 2021

  (Zoe S.Y. Wong (Miss))
  Clerk to H.H.J Tam

Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

HKSAR v. Ng Kin Keung
DCCC 120/2020
District Court15 Jul 2021
Cited by 1 case

Other judgments that cite this case

HKSAR v. Ng Kin Keung
District Court15 Jul 2021
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under DCCC 120/2020

HKSAR v. Ng Kin Keung
District Court15 Jul 2021