Read the full judgment text of CACV 93/2020 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 6 October 2021.
1. The defendant is a mentally incapacitated person as defined under the Mental Health Ordinance , Cap. 136 (‘ MHO ’). He has been in that condition since childhood. He studied in a special school up to Form 3 and had been a cleaning worker in different companies. He was earning about $7,000 to $8,000 a month. He is the registered owner of a flat in Tseung Kwan O, which was a gift from his parents. He is married and his wife is also a mentally incapacitated person. According to the medical
Cites 1 case