C.L. Chow & Macksion Chan, Solicitors (A Firm) v. Chan Pui Fat and Others
Read the full judgment text of HCA 2461/2017 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 25 October 2021.
1. On page 2, paragraph 3, line Q, “the 4 th to 9 th Defedants” should read: “the 6 th to 9 th Defendants”.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case
|
HCA 2461/2017 [2021] HKCFI 3086 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO 2461 OF 2017 ________________________ BETWEEN
________________________
________________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ________________________ Please note the following corrigenda for the Judgment dated 25 October 2021:- 1.On page 2, paragraph 3, line Q, “the 4th to 9th Defedants” should read: “the 6th to 9th Defendants”. 2.On page 11, paragraph 32, line E, “the Officer Bill” should read: “the Office Bill”. 3.On page 20, paragraph 54, line F, “has not been not expressly” should read: “has not been expressly”. 4.On page 27, paragraph 75, line R, “the Defendants could hope” should read: “the Defendants could hope for”. 5.On page 30, paragraph 84(a), line F, “22 August 2015” should read: “22 August 2017”. 6.On page 30, paragraph 84(a), line G, “9 August 2015” should read: “9 August 2017”. 7.On page 31, paragraph 84(d), line B, “9 August 2015” should read: “9 August 2017”. 8.On page 33, paragraph 90, line R, “Chow is prepared to say” should read: “Chow was prepared to say”. 9.On page 42, paragraph 126, line H, “Taxation Bill was more that” should read: “Taxation Bill was more than”. Dated the 2nd day of November 2021
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 2461/2017