Chung Pui Tong v. Qian Zhen

Read the full judgment text of CACV 68/2020 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 17 December 2021.

1. On 19 November 2021, we handed down our judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s summons for stay of execution filed on 13 May 2021. We made an order nisi that the plaintiff is to pay the defendant’s costs of the application and gave directions for the defendant’s solicitors to lodge a statement of costs for summary assessment.

Cites 1 case

Case No.CACV 68/2020[2021] HKCA 1916
Court
Court of Appeal
Date17 Dec 2021
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 68 /2020

[2021] HKCA 1916

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO 68 OF 2020

(ON APPEAL FROM HCA NO 2555 OF 2014)

________________________

BETWEEN    
  CHUNG PUI TONG Plaintiff
  and
  QIAN ZHEN (錢珍) Defendant

_______________________

Before: Hon Kwan VP and Cheung JA in Court
Date of Decision on Costs: 17 December 2021

________________________

DECISION ON COSTS

________________________

Hon Kwan VP (giving the Decision on Costs of the Court):

1.On 19 November 2021, we handed down our judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s summons for stay of execution filed on 13 May 2021. We made an order nisi that the plaintiff is to pay the defendant’s costs of the application and gave directions for the defendant’s solicitors to lodge a statement of costs for summary assessment.

2.The defendant’s solicitors lodged a statement of costs on 30 November 2021 for total costs of $173,088.  On 6 December 2021, the plaintiff’s solicitors lodged a four-page document setting out the objections and response to the statement of costs and suggesting that the costs recoverable be reduced to $63,238.

3.There being no application to vary the order nisi, the costs order is made absolute.

4.Having considered the statement of costs and the objections, we assess summarily the costs to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant at $121,000.

(Susan Kwan)
Vice President
(Peter Cheung)
Justice of Appeal

Charles Wong & Co, for the Plaintiff (Appellant)

H Y Leung & Co, LLP, for the Defendant (Respondent)