T v. B
Read the full judgment text of HCCT 13/2021 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 29 December 2021 before Hon Coleman J.
This judgment involves the construction and arbitration proceedings HCCT 13/2021 and HCCT 14/2021 heard together in the High Court of Hong Kong SAR's Court of First Instance. The matters concern Order 73 Rule 5 of the Rules of High Court (Cap. 4A) and the enforcement or related issues arising from an Arbitration Interim Award dated 30 October 2020 in Case No. HKIAC/20052 by Mr. Philip V. Boulding QC pursuant to section 81 of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609) and Article 34 of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. A corrigendum was issued on 13 January 2022 with corrections to dates and text regarding the summons date, subcontract period, applicable statutory section, and the decision on the stay application. The judgment was delivered by Hon Coleman J in chambers on 29 December 2021. The record does not contain explicit legal issues, detailed factual or procedural history, or final disposition and orders.
Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case
|
HCCT 13/2021 [2021] HKCFI 3645 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTRUCTION AND ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 13 OF 2021 ________________________
________________________ BETWEEN
________________ AND HCCT 14/2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTRUCTION AND ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 14 OF 2021 ________________ BETWEEN
________________ (Heard together) Before: Hon Coleman J in Chambers (Not Open to Public) Date of Hearing: 1 December 2021 Date of Judgment: 29 December 2021 Date of Corrigendum: 13 January 2022 ________________ CORRIGENDUM ________________ Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 29 December 2021: - 1. At page 6 between line H and I, the words, “By Summons dated 17 February 2019”, should read as “By Summons dated 17 February 2021”; 2. At page 12 between line L and M, the words, “The Sub-contract was to run from 25 April 2018 to 28 July 2021”, should read as “The Sub-contract was to run from 25 April 2018 to 28 July 2024”; 3. At page 21 between line Q and R, the words, “section 20(5) of the AO is simply inapplicable”, should read as “section 34(5) of the AO is simply inapplicable; 4. At page 23 between line F and G, the words, “The Stay Application falls to be dismissed”, should read as “The Stay Application is granted”; Dated the 13th day of January 2022
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCCT 13/2021