Am v. Director of Immigration and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 466/2021 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 22 April 2022.

1. At page 68 between line R and S, the words, “it was dealt with in ZN(CFA) at §§190-191”, should read as “it was dealt with in ZN(CA) at §§190-191”;

Cited by 9 cases · Cites 2 cases

Case No.HCAL 466/2021[2022] HKCFI 1046
Court
High Court CFI
Date22 Apr 2022
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL 466/2021

[2022] HKCFI 1046

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 466 OF 2021

________________________

BETWEEN    
  AM Applicant
  and  
  DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION 1st Putative
    Respondent
  COMMISSIONER OF POLICE 2nd Putative
    Respondent
  SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE 3rd Putative
    Respondent

________________________

AND

HCAL 617/2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 617 OF 2021

________________________

BETWEEN    
  CB Applicant
  and  
  COMMISSIONER OF POLICE 1st Putative
    Respondent
  SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE 2nd Putative
    Respondent
  and  
  SECRETARY FOR SECURITY Putative
    Interested Party

________________

(Heard together)

Before: Hon Coleman J in Court
Dates of Hearing: 28-29 March 2022
Date of Decision: 22 April 2022
Date of Corrigendum: 26 April 2022

_____________________

CORRIGENDUM

_____________________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Decision dated 22 April 2022: -

1.At page 68 between line R and S, the words, “it was dealt with in ZN(CFA) at §§190-191”, should read as “it was dealt with in ZN(CA) at §§190-191”;

2.

Dated the 26th day of April 2022

  (Alvin Kwok)
for Registrar, High Court