Zfy v. Schc

________________________

Hon Cheung JA (giving the Decision on Costs of the Court) :

1.The Father seeks to vary the costs order made by this Court on 2 June 2022. He asks for no order as to costs of his application.

2.Costs are in the discretion of the Court. The application before us was a renewed application for leave to appeal. The Judge below had already refused to grant leave. Before us, the Father had likewise failed to satisfy the threshold of showing that his appeal has a reasonable prospect of success. The hearing before us had not even reached the stage of a proper appeal which may engage the ‘costs practice’ discussed in TPL v WYY formerly known as WYY (CACV 47/2014). In any event, that case expressly recognized that the ‘costs practice’ is not a rigid rule. As the proposed challenge was unmeritous, costs should follow the event. We also recognized the financial disparity between the parties. A no costs order will operate harshly against the Mother : see Keller v Keller and Legal Aid Board [1995] 1 FLR 259.

3.Accordingly, the application is refused with costs to the Mother.

4.We will summarily assess the costs at $518,000 which include $418,000 as fee for two counsel.

CAMP 87/2022 [2022] HKCA 1036 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 87 OF 2022 (ON AN INTENDED APPEAL FROM FCMP NO. 97 OF 2020) ________________________ BETWEEN       ZFY Applicant   and     SCHC Respondent   (Child Relocation)   ________________________ Before :  Hon Cheung, G Lam and Chow JJA in Court Date of Decision on Costs :  12 July 2022 ________________________

DECISION  ON  COSTS

(Peter Cheung) Justice of Appeal

(Godfrey Lam) Justice of Appeal

(Anderson Chow) Justice of Appeal

Ms Lily Yu, instructed by Nixon Peabody CWL, for the Applicant

Ms Alison Choy, instructed by Pansy Leung Tang & Chua, for the Respondent