Read the full judgment text of FCMC 13567/2012 on BabelCite. This Family Court judgment before 彭家光.
Matrimonial proceedings – Ancillary relief – Application for leave to appeal – Asset dissipation – Valuation – District Court Ordinance s.63A – Leave refused. The Petitioner sought leave to appeal against a judgment ordering a lump sum payment of $1,977,307. Grounds included error in treating $3.46 million as hidden assets and error in accepting UVH valuation of $565,000. The Court found no reasonable prospect of success on any ground. Leave to appeal refused. Appellant to pay Respondent's costs.
Legal issues: Whether the finding of hidden assets was erroneous · Whether the UVH valuation was erroneous · Whether leave to appeal should be granted
Outcome: Leave to appeal refused. Appellant to pay Respondent's costs.
Cites 1 case