Read the full judgment text of DCCC 436/2020 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 16 September 2022.
1. The first defendant has been charged with 14 counts of engaging in a commercial practice that constitutes wrongly accepting payment for a product, contrary to section 13I and 18(1) of the Trade Descriptions Ordinance, Cap. 362 (charges 1-7, 9-10, 12-13, 15-17), 2 counts of applying a false trade description to a service supplied or offered to be supplied to a consumer, contrary to sections 7A(1)(a) and 18(1) of the Trade Descriptions Ordinance, Cap. 362 (charges 8, 14), 1 count of breach o
Cites 2 cases