Powertechnic Ltd v. The Incorporated Owners of Monte Vista

Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 874/2019 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 27 September 2022.

1. Page 7, paragraph 13 “… (the application was only formally lodged on 9 April 2022 and heard on 10 June 2022…” should read as “… (the application was only formally lodged on 9 June 2022 and heard on 10 June 2022… ”.

Cited by 2 cases

Case No.DCCJ 874/2019[2022] HKDC 1023
Court
District Court
Date27 Sep 2022
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

DCCJ 874 & 878/2019 (Consolidated)

[2022] HKDC 1023

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CIVIL ACTION NOS 874 & 878 OF 2019

(TRNSFERRED FROM HCA1226/2018 AND HCA749/2017)

---------------------------------------

BETWEEN

  POWERTECHNIC LIMITED Plaintiff
  and  
  THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF MONTE Defendant
  VISTA 翠擁華庭業主立案法團  

---------------------------------------

(Consolidated by the Order of Mr Registrar Ho dated
the 18th day of March 2019)

---------------------------------------

Before: Deputy District Judge Joseph Vaughan in Court
Dates of Hearing: 7, 8 & 10 June 2022
Date of Decision: 27 September 2022
Date of Corrigendum: 27 October 2022

----------------------

CORRIGENDUM

----------------------

Please note the following amendments in the Decision handed down on 27 September 2022:-

1.Page 7, paragraph 13 “… (the application was only formally lodged on 9 April 2022 and heard on 10 June 2022…” should read as “… (the application was only formally lodged on 9 June 2022 and heard on 10 June 2022…”.

2.Page 7, paragraph 14 “… I do not think the defendant should be shut out from the opportunity of putting forward its entire case in terms of the evidence.” should read as “… I do not think the plaintiff should be shut out from the opportunity of putting forward its entire case in terms of the evidence.”.

Dated the 27th day of October 2022

  ( M.H. MA (Miss))
Clerk to Deputy District Judge Joseph Vaughan