Steadfast International Ltd v. Tuenbo Co Ltd and Others
Read the full judgment text of HCA 2095/2016 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 20 October 2022.
1. Page 13 at line M: “substantial right” should read as “substantive right”.
Cites 3 cases
|
HCA 2095/2016 and HCA 566/2019 [2022] HKCFI 3251 HCA 2095/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO 2095 OF 2016 ____________
AND HCA 566/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO 566 OF 2019 ____________
____________ Before : Hon Au-Yeung J in Chambers Date of Hearing : 13 July 2022 Date of Decision : 20 October 2022 Date of Corrigendum: 28 October 2022 ________________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ________________________ Please note the following amendments in the decision dated 20 October 2022: 1. Page 13 at line M: “substantial right” should read as “substantive right”. 2. Page 16 at line Q: “for granting mandatory relief” should read as “for granting mandatory injunctive relief”. 3. Page 17 at line F: “so” should be deleted. 4. Page 20 at line C: “a strange paper” should read as “a strange prayer”. 5. Pages 24 at line G: “dragged into HCA 566/2019” should read as “dragged into the trial of HCA 566/2019”.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 2095/2016