|
HCA 1878/2020
[2022] HKCFI 3315
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
ACTION NO. 1878 OF 2020
--------------------------
| BETWEEN |
|
|
| |
LEE CHI KEUNG (李志强) |
1st Plaintiff |
| |
CHAN SHING (陳成) |
2nd Plaintiff |
| |
LEE CHI KEUNG (李志强) and
CHAN SHING (陳成) (suing on behalf of
themselves as shareholders in MAX DRAGON
INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LIMITED) |
3rd Plaintiff |
|
and
|
| |
WONG CHI CHIN (黃熾展) |
1st Defendant |
| |
TSE SHUK FONG (謝淑芳) |
2nd Defendant |
| |
MAX DRAGON INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LIMITED |
3rd Defendant |
--------------------------
HCA 1879/2020
ACTION NO. 1879 OF 2020
--------------------------
| BETWEEN |
|
|
| |
LEE CHI KEUNG (李志强) |
1st Plaintiff |
| |
CHAN SHING (陳成) |
2nd Plaintiff |
| |
LEE CHI KEUNG (李志强) and
CHAN SHING (陳成) (suing on behalf of
themselves as shareholders in LUCKY HONEST
INTERNATIONAL LIMITED) |
3rd Plaintiff |
|
and
|
| |
WONG CHI CHIN (黃熾展) |
1st Defendant |
| |
TSE SHUK FONG (謝淑芳) |
2nd Defendant |
| |
LUCKY HONEST INTERNATIONAL LIMITED |
3rd Defendant |
--------------------------
HCA 1880/2020
ACTION NO. 1880 OF 2020
--------------------------
| BETWEEN |
|
|
| |
LEE CHI KEUNG (李志强) |
1st Plaintiff |
| |
CHAN SHING (陳成) |
2nd Plaintiff |
| |
LEE CHI KEUNG (李志强) and
CHAN SHING (陳成) (suing on behalf of
themselves as shareholders in MEGA DRAGON
INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LIMITED) |
3rd Plaintiff |
|
and
|
| |
WONG CHI CHIN (黃熾展) |
1st Defendant |
| |
TSE SHUK FONG (謝淑芳) |
2nd Defendant |
| |
MEGA DRAGON INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LIMITED |
3rd Defendant |
--------------------------
HCA 1881/2020
ACTION NO. 1881 OF 2020
--------------------------
| BETWEEN |
|
|
| |
LIT HEI KING (列喜敬) |
1st Plaintiff |
| |
LIT HEI KING (列喜敬) (suing on behalf
of herself as shareholder in WISDOM
WELL INVESTMENT LIMITED) |
2nd Plaintiff |
|
and
|
| |
TSE SHUK FONG (謝淑芳) |
1st Defendant |
| |
WISDOM WELL INVESTMENT LIMITED
(志偉投資有限公司) |
2nd Defendant |
--------------------------
Before: Deputy High Court Judge H. Au-Yeung in Chambers (Open to Public)
Date of Hearing: 24 August 2022
Date of Decision: 10 November 2022
Date of Corrigendum: 18 November 2022
--------------------------
CORRIGENDUM
--------------------------
Please note that the following amendment in the Decision dated 10 November 2022:
1. Paragraph 129 should read: "I make a costs order nisi that the plaintiffs shall bear the defendants’ costs of the Summonses. Because of the volume of the documents involved in the 4 Actions, I take the preliminary view that such costs shall be taxed forthwith if not agreed."
| |
(HO Tsz-kit) |
| |
Clerk to Deputy High Court Judge |
| |
H. Au-Yeung |
|