Manvir Singh v. Torture Claims Appeal Board
Read the full judgment text of CACV 67/2021 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 31 December 2021.
1. At page 1 line J, TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD should be described as “1 st Putative Respondent”.
Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case
|
CACV 67/2021 [2021] HKCA 1995 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO 67 OF 2021 (ON APPEAL FROM HCAL NO 860 OF 2018) ____________________
____________________
________________________ CORRIGENDUM ________________________
1.At page 1 line J, TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD should be described as “1st Putative Respondent”. 2.At page 1 line L, DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION should be described as “2nd Putative Respondent”. Dated this 20th day of January, 2023
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 67/2021