Lee Hong Kong Hansen v. Mtr Corporation Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCPI 850/2016 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 27 February 2023.

1. At page 22, between lines G and H, “… does not mean that MTR was not in breach of its duty …” should read “… does not mean that MTR was in breach of its duty …”

Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCPI 850/2016[2023] HKCFI 636
Court
High Court CFI
Date27 Feb 2023
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCPI 850/2016

[2023] HKCFI 636

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO 850 OF 2016

________________________

BETWEEN

  LEE HONG KONG HANSEN Plaintiff
  and  
  MTR CORPORATION LIMITED Defendant

________________________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge Leung in Court
Dates of Hearing: 6-8, 11-12 July and 26 August 2022
Date of Judgment: 27 February 2023
Date of Corrigendum: 2 March 2023

____________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

____________________

Please note the following amendment to the Judgment dated 27 February 2023:

1.At page 22, between lines G and H, “… does not mean that MTR was not in breach of its duty …” should read “… does not mean that MTR was in breach of its duty …”

  ( Minnie Ko )
for Registrar, High Court

Cited by 1 case

Other judgments that cite this case

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCPI 850/2016