Lo Kwok Kit Sam v. Leung Kwok Hung t/a Kaiser (M&E) Decoration Engineering Co and Another

Read the full judgment text of DCPI 983/2020 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 20 February 2023.

1. Page 2, paragraph 1, “…in a person injuries action arising out of an accident…” should read as “…in a personal injuries action arising out of an accident…”.

Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.DCPI 983/2020[2023] HKDC 268
Court
District Court
Date20 Feb 2023
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

DCPI 983/2020

[2023] HKDC 268

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO 983 OF 2020

--------------------------

BETWEEN

  LO KWOK KIT SAM Plaintiff

and

  LEUNG KWOK HUNG
trading as KAISER (M&E) DECORATION ENGINEERING CO
1st Defendant
  SHINRYO (HONG KONG) LIMITED 2nd Defendant
  MTR CORPORATION LIMITED Non-Party

--------------------------

Before: Master Louise Chan in Chambers (paper disposal)
Dates of Plaintiff’s Skeleton Submissions: 26 September 2022 &
31 October 2022
Date of Non-party Skeleton Submissions: 24 October 2022
Date of Decision: 20 February 2023
Date of Corrigendum: 11 April 2023

---------------------

CORRIGENDUM

---------------------

Please note the following amendments in the Decision dated 20 February 2023: -

1.Page 2, paragraph 1, “…in a person injuries action arising out of an accident…” should read as “…in a personal injuries action arising out of an accident…”.

2.Page 6, paragraph 15, “…the room shown in those photos did not assemble the room where he injured himself.” should read as “…the room shown in those photos did not resemble the room where he injured himself.”.

3.Page 8, paragraph 20, “As mentioned in paragraph 14, I have…” should read as “As mentioned in paragraph 14 above, I have…”.

4.Page 13, paragraph 32, “…a hole and bulging wall which were agreed by MTR.” should read as “…a hole and bulging wall were all agreed by MTR.”.

5.Page 14, footnote 12, “Earlier correspondence from two letters from the Plaintiff’s solicitors to MTR and Deacons...” should read as “Earlier correspondence of two letters from the Plaintiff’s solicitors to MTR and Deacons...”.

  ( Louise Chan )
  Master, District Court